No On Prop 8
The other day, as I was driving to work, there was a short news blurb about opponents of Prop 8 setting up an office in Santa Clara county, to begin their campaign to overturn Prop 8 in 2012. The reporter made a point to say that even though Santa Clara county opposed Prop 8 in the 2008 election, there were still significant portions of the population that supported Prop 8. Towards the end of the news blurb, they quoted someone from the opposing camp, a spokesperson of the group that is fighting to uphold Prop 8. The gentleman stated that the group will continue to "fight for marriage to be a union between man and woman because that's what's good for families, and good for our communities, and good for California."
That got me thinking a bit... if marriage is good for families, and good for our communities, why aren't we fighting harder for the institution of marriage itself? With America's divorce rate at above 50%, which translates to countless of broken families, and children who have to live through messy divorces and custody battles, and ultimately end up having to grow up in single-parent homes, why aren't these "defenders" of marriage fighting harder to preserve families and lower the divorce rate?? Why are they instead spending all their energy from excluding people from the institution of marriage? Would any of them be so bold as to propose that we ban divorces?? NO!! You know why? Because they would be laughed out of the country!
When a nation's divorce rate is above 50%, you have to think that a significant percentage of the population actually doesn't value "marriage" and what marriage vows mean. And to all those people who've been divorced AND support Prop 8, I think you shouldn't get much of a say in the matter because marriage clearly doesn't mean much to you if you're so willing to break your marriage vows. So, since marriage doesn't mean anything to you, you've little right to prevent others, to whom marriage does mean a great deal, from making a public commitment to the person that they love.
There's another group out there whom I think also shouldn't get much of a supportive say for Prop 8, and those are the people who are wedded by common law. So, technically California doesn't recognize common law marriages, but the general idea is, if you've lived with your significant other for an extended period of time, and enjoy all the benefits of marriage, but never actually took the time to get married and publicly declared your commitment to one another, you probably don't think much of the institution of marriage either. So again, what do you care who can or can't get married to each other? It has no impact on you.
I believe that marriage, whether between a woman and man, or two women, or two men, is good for our society. When two people take the time and effort to publicly declare their love and commitment to each other, it's a strong and powerful thing. These two people are promising to support each other, to take care of each other, through sickness, emotional turmoil, and economic downturn. These are all good things from a societal standpoint because more people will have stronger support networks, which lightens the burden on society and our social services. So, while I agree that marriage is good for our communities and good for California, I can't for the life of me figure out why marriage can only be good for our communities, if constrained to those only between a man and a woman. That argument just doesn't hold water for me.